Iran has refuted suggestions that an imminent major agreement with the United States is on the horizon, citing unresolved key issues despite strides made in ongoing discussions. Esmail Baghaei, the spokesperson for Iran’s foreign ministry, noted that while there has been progress and mutual understanding on several points, a finalized deal remains uncertain. Baghaei pointed to conflicting statements from Washington and interference from Israel as factors hindering the negotiation process.
A significant aspect of these talks is the potential reopening of the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping. Iran has clarified its stance, stating that it does not intend to impose tolls on passing ships. Instead, it may levy charges for navigational and environmental protection services, in a coordinated effort with Oman. Furthermore, Iran has emphasized that any final agreement must encompass a ceasefire in Lebanon and the lifting of restrictions on Iranian ports and shipping activities.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has acknowledged the ongoing discussions, describing the current proposals as substantial. The proposed framework reportedly includes a 30-day period following the ceasefire, during which Iran would commit to clearing mines from the Strait of Hormuz and ensuring full maritime access. Concurrently, the US military has confirmed conducting strikes in southern Iran, targeting missile launch sites and vessels allegedly preparing to lay mines. Washington has described this military action as a measure of self-defense while reiterating its support for the ceasefire efforts.
President Donald Trump has commented on the potential deal, stating that any final agreement must be “great and meaningful,” otherwise, a deal would not be pursued. He has also called for several Middle Eastern nations to join the Abraham Accords and normalize relations with Israel. However, reports indicate that regional leaders have shown little interest in this proposal. Another contentious point in the negotiations is Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. While Tehran has expressed a willingness to temporarily reduce enrichment levels, it has rejected demands to transfer its uranium stockpile abroad and is seeking the release of billions of dollars in frozen assets held overseas.
Iranian officials have argued that internal political divisions within the United States, including criticism from Congress and factions within the Republican Party, are exerting pressure on the White House, thereby complicating the negotiation process. Notably, the proposed agreement does not address Iran’s ballistic missile program or its support for regional armed groups, rendering it less comprehensive than previous US demands.